How 1031 Exchanges and Cost Segregation Work Together to Save Taxes

Navigating the intersection of 1031 exchanges and cost segregation can be challenging, but it offers significant opportunities for tax deferral and accelerated depreciation when done correctly. These two powerful tools are often used by real estate investors to optimize their tax strategies, yet their combined use introduces complexities that require careful planning and a nuanced understanding of tax law.

Recently, a group of cost segregation professionals gathered to discuss the subtleties of 1031 exchanges and how they affect cost segregation studies. The session highlighted key issues, misconceptions, and strategies for navigating these transactions effectively.

What is a 1031 Exchange? Key Rules and Benefits Explained

A 1031 exchange, named after Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, allows real estate investors to defer capital gains taxes when they sell one investment property and reinvest the proceeds into another property of like kind. This tax-deferral strategy promotes economic activity by encouraging property transactions without the immediate burden of taxation.

Key Features of 1031 Exchanges:
  • 5-Year Property:
    Carpeting, appliances, and electrical systems tied to non-structural uses.
  • 7-Year Property:
    Office furniture or decorative fixtures.
  • 15-Year Property:
    Driveways, landscaping, and retaining walls.
For example, consider a single-family rental valued at $300,000 (excluding land). A cost segregation study might identify $60,000 of assets that qualify for accelerated depreciation. This upfront deduction provides immediate tax savings and improves the property’s cash flow, especially in the first few years of ownership.

The Role of Cost Segregation in 1031 Exchanges

Cost segregation, a tax strategy that accelerates depreciation by reclassifying building components into shorter-lived assets, can maximize deductions for investors. However, when combined with a 1031 exchange, the process becomes more intricate due to how the property basis transitions.

Why Cost Segregation Matters in 1031 Transactions:

  • Maximizing Deductions:
    By identifying components eligible for accelerated depreciation, cost segregation increases tax savings in the early years of property ownership.
  • Critical Timing:
    Investors often rely on cost segregation studies soon after purchasing a property to optimize deductions. In a 1031 exchange, understanding how the old basis affects the new property is essential to achieving accurate results.
For instance, consider an investor who sells a shopping center and uses the proceeds to purchase a larger retail property through a 1031 exchange. A cost segregation study on the new property would help identify personal property and land improvements eligible for shorter depreciation periods, but only the portion of the basis that is considered "new money" qualifies for bonus depreciation.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in 1031 Exchanges and Cost Segregation

The combination of 1031 exchanges and cost segregation can create confusion, particularly around eligibility for bonus depreciation and the treatment of basis. Investors frequently misunderstand:
  • 1. Basis Transition:
    Many believe the purchase price of the new property becomes the full depreciable basis, overlooking the impact of the old property’s remaining basis.
  • 2. Bonus Depreciation:
    Bonus depreciation only applies to the "new money" introduced in the exchange, not the carried-over basis.
  • 3. Timing Missteps:
    Investors often wait too long to involve cost segregation professionals, leading to missed opportunities or delays in completing studies.
By understanding these nuances, investors can better plan their transactions and avoid costly surprises.

1031 Exchanges and Cost Segregation: The Core Challenge

When combining 1031 exchanges with cost segregation, the main challenge lies in understanding how the basis transitions from one property to the next. This transition impacts depreciation calculations, which ultimately determines the tax benefits an investor can realize. Missteps in this area can lead to unrealistic expectations or missed opportunities.

“Many investors assume the full purchase price of the new property is available for depreciation,” said Don Poland, a CPA with extensive experience in tax law. “But the reality is, the IRS requires the remaining basis from the old property to carry over, which can be a shock if you’re not prepared for it.”

The Basis Transition: Understanding the Numbers

A key feature of 1031 exchanges is the way the IRS handles the basis of the relinquished property. The remaining net book value—the original purchase price minus accumulated depreciation—becomes the starting basis for the replacement property. This calculation is critical for accurate cost segregation studies.

Example: Basis Transition in Action
Let’s say an investor purchased a property for $1,000,000 two decades ago. Over 20 years, they depreciated $500,000. They sell the property for $2,000,000 and use a 1031 exchange to purchase a replacement property worth $2,000,000.

At first glance, it may seem like the new property’s depreciable basis is $2,000,000. However, the IRS requires that the remaining basis of the relinquished property—$500,000—be carried over as the starting basis for the new property. Unless additional “new money” is introduced into the transaction, only this $500,000 is eligible for depreciation.

“Understanding this transfer of basis is crucial,” said John Denovi, a partner at Jennings Zovich. “I often see investors come in expecting a $2,000,000 basis for depreciation, only to find that the actual number is far lower. It’s a harsh wake-up call.”

Real-Life Examples of 1031 Exchange Basis Missteps

Bonus depreciation offers significant tax savings by allowing property owners to deduct a large portion of qualifying assets in the first year. However, it only applies to “new money”—the portion of the basis that represents new equity or additional funds added to the transaction. Carried-over basis from the relinquished property does not qualify.

Example: Bonus Depreciation in Action
Continuing from the previous scenario:
  • The $500,000 carried over from the relinquished property is not eligible for bonus depreciation.
  • If the investor adds $500,000 in renovation costs to the new property, that amount qualifies for bonus depreciation as "new money."
  • This distinction often surprises investors who expect the entire $2,000,000 purchase price to be eligible for accelerated deductions.
As Don Poland put it, “Bonus depreciation only applies to new interests. The IRS isn’t going to let you double-dip by taking depreciation again on money that was already depreciated on the old property.”

Strategies to Maximize Tax Savings with 1031 Exchanges and Common Errors

Investors often struggle with the complexities of 1031 exchanges and cost segregation, leading to frequent misconceptions:
  • 1. “I Can Depreciate the Full Purchase Price of My New Property.”
    This is one of the most common misunderstandings. As noted earlier, the carried-over basis from the old property limits the amount eligible for depreciation.
  • 2. “Bonus Depreciation Applies to Everything.”
    Only new money qualifies for bonus depreciation. For investors who are unaware of this rule, the results of a cost segregation study can be disappointing.
  • 3. “Allocating Values Is Simple.”
    Determining how much of the new property qualifies for depreciation isn’t straightforward. It requires a detailed analysis of land values, building components, and personal property, often in collaboration with accountants and exchange agents.
Example: Missteps in Practice
An investor purchases a new apartment building for $3,000,000 after completing a 1031 exchange. They expect to accelerate depreciation on the entire purchase price. However, the carried-over basis from their relinquished property is $600,000, and they only introduced $400,000 of new equity. As a result, only the $400,000 qualifies for bonus depreciation. The final deductions fall far short of their expectations, leading to frustration and missed planning opportunities.

“Every year, I see investors who are caught off guard by these rules,” said Don Poland. “That’s why it’s so important to involve professionals early in the process—before these transactions close.”

Should You Skip the 1031 Exchange? Key Considerations

The interplay between 1031 exchanges and cost segregation creates a unique set of challenges, especially when it comes to maximizing tax benefits. Success depends on collaboration between investors, CPAs, cost segregation professionals, and sometimes 1031 exchange agents. Without clear communication and an understanding of the key rules, the process can become frustrating and costly.

Common Scenarios and Practical Solutions
  • 1. Scenario: Misunderstanding the Basis Transition
    Many investors mistakenly assume their new property’s purchase price is the starting point for depreciation. As John Denovi noted during the seminar, “The carried-over basis from the old property often catches investors off guard. They expect $3,000,000 in depreciation but find out only $600,000 is eligible.”
  • Solution:
    Before committing to a 1031 exchange, investors should ask their CPA to calculate the exact basis that will carry over. This includes considering how much of the new property’s value qualifies for bonus depreciation. If the CPA cannot provide a timely estimate, cost segregation firms can guide the investor by estimating based on available documentation, such as closing statements and old depreciation schedules.
  • 2. Scenario: Delayed CPA Collaboration
    Cost segregation studies often stall because CPAs do not calculate the new basis until just before the tax deadline. “It’s not unusual to see CPAs wait until April 14 to finalize a client’s numbers,” said Don Poland. “This puts cost segregation professionals in a bind when the study needs to be completed much earlier.”
  • Solution:
    Proactively request key financial documents—such as closing statements and prior depreciation schedules—at the start of the process. If the CPA is unresponsive, consider performing a preliminary analysis based on the best available data. As Don explained, “CPAs are more likely to respond when you’ve already done some groundwork. Send them your estimates, and they’ll correct it faster than if you simply ask them to start from scratch.”

Plan Ahead: How to Get the Most from Cost Segregation and 1031 Exchanges

Investors can take steps to ensure they capture the full potential of tax savings through 1031 exchanges and cost segregation. These include asking the right questions, involving professionals early, and avoiding common pitfalls.

Step 1: Ask About Basis and Bonus Depreciation Upfront
When evaluating a property for a 1031 exchange, ask:
  • What is the basis of the old property?
  • How much of the new property’s value is considered “new money” and eligible for bonus depreciation?
Clear answers to these questions will prevent surprises during cost segregation studies.
Step 2: Collaborate Early and Often
Successful tax planning requires teamwork between the investor, their CPA, and their cost segregation firm. Initiate these conversations as soon as you consider a 1031 exchange, even before signing the agreement with the exchange agent.

Step 3: Work with Experts
1031 exchanges are complex, and even experienced CPAs may struggle with the nuances. As Don Poland noted, “At my old firm with thousands of employees, only one person was capable of doing the calculations for a 1031 exchange. These aren’t skills every accountant has.”
By working with a cost segregation professional who understands the unique challenges of 1031 exchanges, you can identify opportunities to maximize deductions and avoid costly errors.

Ready To Unlock Your Property's Tax Potential?

Expert Analysis • Maximum Savings
Get An Estimate!

Looking Ahead: Are 1031 Exchanges Always Worth It?

While 1031 exchanges are a powerful tool for deferring capital gains taxes, they aren’t always the best strategy. As shared during the seminar, some investors find that the limitations of carried-over basis and bonus depreciation outweigh the benefits.

Example: Skipping the 1031 Exchange
One investor, instead of completing a 1031 exchange, chose to sell multiple properties, pay the recapture taxes, and reinvest the proceeds into a new property. By doing so, they were able to depreciate the entire purchase price of the new property—including the bonus depreciation available at the time. This approach resulted in significant first-year tax savings and a simpler transaction process.

“Sometimes it makes sense to skip the 1031 exchange,” said Richard Bal. “If you’re only seeing a small gain or the math doesn’t work out for bonus depreciation, it may be better to take the hit on taxes and move forward with a clean slate.”

Conclusion: Plan Ahead, Maximize Savings

The intersection of 1031 exchanges and cost segregation is full of opportunities—but also pitfalls. Understanding how basis transitions, the impact of bonus depreciation, and the role of old vs. new money can help investors make smarter decisions. Collaboration with CPAs and cost segregation professionals is crucial to navigating these complexities.

Whether you’re planning a 1031 exchange or exploring cost segregation for your investment property, Maven Cost Seg can help. Visit Maven Cost Seg to learn more about our services and how we can guide you through even the most complicated scenarios. Let’s ensure you capture every tax benefit available.